Brought to you by
Native Platform Ltd
© 2017-2025
All rights reserved
Native Platform Ltd
© 2017-2025
All rights reserved
Quilgo vs. competitors: which online exam proctoring tool is right for you?
March 3, 2025
With remote testing becoming the norm, institutions and businesses need a secure, reliable, and scalable solution for online assessments. But with so many options available, how does Quilgo compare to other leading tools?
Below, we break down key competitors, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and what makes Quilgo stand out.
Key features compared
| Feature | Quilgo | Proctorio | ExamSoft | Respondus | Honorlock | ProctorU | Mercer Mettl | TestWe | Talview |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| quilgo.com | proctorio.com | examsoft.com | respondus.com | honorlock.com | proctoru.com | mettl.com | testwe.eu | talview.com | |
| Automated Proctoring | |||||||||
| No software installation required | |||||||||
| Copy-Paste & Screen Monitoring | |||||||||
| Copy-Paste & Screen Monitoring | |||||||||
| Price | USD 120 per year start (source) | USD 8-10 per 1 student per year (source) | USD 60 per 1 student per year (source) | USD 4950 per year/USD 15 per 1 student | USD 4.45 per exam (source) | USD 15 per exam (source) | USD 500 (?) (source) | USD 24 per year start (source) | USD 15 per 1 student per year (source) |
| Cost-Effective | N/D | ||||||||
| LMS integration |
The online assessment industry is filled with robust, feature-rich solutions, and we acknowledge that many competitors provide high-quality tools for secure and efficient testing. The core functionalities across platforms have reached an impressive standard, from proctoring to analytics. However, when choosing the right tool, it's not just about features—it's about how these tools are structured, priced, and scaled to fit real-world needs.
Pricing models: how Quilgo stands out
Pricing models can vary significantly when choosing an online proctoring or assessment tool. Some platforms charge per test, others per student, and many require costly institution-wide licenses. Understanding these differences is crucial in selecting the most cost-effective and scalable solution.
Standard pricing models in the market
Most online proctoring and exam platforms follow one of these pricing structures:
- Pay-per-exam - Charges for each test attempt, regardless of how many students take exams simultaneously.
- Per-student subscription - A flat rate per student per month or year, often limiting the number of exams.
- Institution-wide licensing - A high-cost, bulk contract for unlimited use within an organization.
- Hidden or custom pricing - Some platforms require direct contact for a quote, often leading to unclear costs.
How Quilgo's unique pricing model works
Quilgo redefines exam pricing with its test-taker seats model, which charges based on the number of students taking tests simultaneously (concurrent test-takers).
No limits on total exams - You can conduct unlimited tests, and pricing is based only on how many students are testing concurrently.
Scales with your needs - Whether you have 10 students or 10,000, you only pay for the number of simultaneous test-takers, making it cost-effective for institutions with fluctuating testing schedules.
Transparent and predictable - No hidden fees, per-test charges, and unnecessary expenses for inactive students.
Why Quilgo's pricing model is a game-changer
Fair and scalable - You're never overpaying for inactive students or locked into per-test fees.
Perfect for fluctuating demand - If your institution runs exams in waves or has peak testing seasons, this model ensures you only pay for active test-takers.
No budget waste - Unlike per-test or per-student subscriptions, you won't pay for unused capacity.
Ready to experience the most cost-efficient proctoring model?
🚀 Try Quilgo today and maximize your testing budget.